On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:42:01AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote: > On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 04:50:52AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > I'm beginning to think that we're going to lose all hope of > > maintaining backwards compat with the current 2.0 auth. But, as > > Greg said, I definitely think that we're going is going to be an > > awfully nice place. -- justin > > If this is enough of a change, why don't we call it the main feature > of 2.1 and start working toward that? I'd really like to see us identify > features like this that are smaller step changes and then do dot > releases on those features. Makes it much easier on our users to > find out what has changed, too.
Heh. Someone finally bit. I was wondering how long it would take before someone brought up 2.1. =) We could also work towards fixing up other stuff in 2.1 (say hi to ap_resource_t). But, the item we've got on the plate here is an aaa rewrite. So, my take is either break configs in 2.0 or move to 2.1. Maintaining backwards compat just doesn't sound healthy. -- justin
