On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 02:30:35PM -0700, Sander van Zoest wrote: > On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Jon Travis wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2002 at 11:29:24AM -0700, Aaron Bannert wrote: > On Thu, Aug 29, >2002 at 02:24:28PM -0400, Ryan Bloom wrote: > > > > I will make one exception to that statement. If it lands inside of > > > > APR-util, under the XML directory, and it is made to work with the XML > > > > parser, I can accept that landing spot. As it fits in closer with our > > > > goals (I think). Jim, I can't decide if this is what you meant or not. > > > I'm +1 on integrating it into our XML stuff. I consider it to be > > > equivalent to apr-util, so either we put it inside apr-util, or > > > we create a new APR subproject or sub-library for it. > > I'm not keen on integrating it into the APR XML layer for a few reasons: > > 1 - APR's XML is not SAX-stylee. El-Kabong is. That isn't to say that E-K > > couldn't get a full object model interface, but it doesn't have it now. > > Expat is a stream based parsers that is pretty similar to SAX2. It > isn't a DOM xml parser.
What does this have to do with anything? Expat is uninvolved here. I was talking about the APR XML API, which may-or-may-not wrap Expat. That API is DOM style. -- Jon
