Jim Jagielski wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >>I will make one exception to that statement. If it lands inside of >>APR-util, under the XML directory, and it is made to work with the XML >>parser, I can accept that landing spot. As it fits in closer with our >>goals (I think). Jim, I can't decide if this is what you meant or not. >> > > > Yes, that is what I meant... side-by-side with the XML stuff under the > APR project in apr-util. >
It makes more sense to me to have a parsers project, since they have a lot in common with each other (and not all that much with other things). But since I'm not going to take on the work of creating such a thing, you can treat that remark with the contempt it deserves :-) Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/ Available for contract work. "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
