On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 02:11:47AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Can anyone suggest a way around this problem? Is my shared memory idea > workable? Is there another way that I'm just blindly missing?
Well, one thing I'd guess you could do is only charge when they receive the final byterange? (Yes, a client could request it out-of-order or do everything but the last byte, but...) You could use shmem, but that'll fail whenever the server is restarted. And, I'd guess byteranges would be most prevalent (in normal use) when the server is restarted. =) -- justin
