> On Sat, Oct 12, 2002 at 10:37:07AM -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > >I don't have a strong opinion about the authn redesign, > > >but I do have one change in mind that would fit well in > > >2.1: async write support. And async read support, but > > >that may take a lot longer. > > > > My belief is that you should design and code up the async support and > > then we can deliberate about where it should go. > > That seems like a one-way street to me. How come it's ok to work on the > auth changes in 2.0 but it's not ok for others?
I didn't make enough noise about this the first time around..... I would like to see the auth changes taken out of 2.0 and moved into 2.1. We need to stablize the API in 2.0 for a reasonable amount of time to encourage module authors to begin porting their modules to 2.0. Bill
