William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > You haven't read a single email on this thread. The ENTIRE POINT of this > thread is that we have a radical change. Auth. Two Bills and who knows > whom all else may concur that we can't reasonably force this change > into 2.0 for docs and upgrade reasons. > > So we have a radical change. I proposed we create 2.1 to incorporate auth. > > Branch 2.1 now? Only if we want to release the auth changes with all of > the upgrade issues of deprecating several released module. It doesn't matter > that "only the names have changed", this is called deprecating a module, > and it shouldn't happen within a GA release cycle on the same minor version. >
But we've done it before... IIRC the referer logging module for example. I 100% appreciate your POV that a bump to 2.1 makes the change even more "substantial" and cleaner. However, I think the group consensus is that the time to branch off a 2.1 isn't quite ready yet. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
