> Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > --On Sunday, October 13, 2002 9:36 PM -0400 Joshua Slive > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> One more note: I'd like to see the rename of mod_access reversed. > >> That just seems like a gratuitous change that hurts users and > >> doesn't really help developers. > > > > > > Could you please explain why breaking out the authorization (authz) > > components in a similar fashion to authentication (authn) is a > > gratuitous change? > > > > I believe mod_authz_host is a much better name for mod_access. It > > indicates that this module is only dealing with authorization based on > > the remote host components. mod_access can mean lots of > things, but the > > fact that it was solely restricted to hostnames wasn't obvious to me > > from the original module name. -- justin > > Sure, mod_authz_host is a slightly better name. But it does not justify > the confusion of renaming the module.
I agree. Bill
