Bill Stoddard wrote: > > At the risk of racing too far ahead in this discussion, here is my > suggestion... 2.0.43 becomes 2.1 and the MMN major does not change for > subsequent 2.1 series releases (except for a compelling reason, eg a > security fix -requires- a bump). Why 2.1? No technical reason; purely a PR > tactic to telegraph to the user community we are putting a lot of focus on > maintaining binary backward compatability and to get rid of the *.0.* in the > version number (yea, to appease the folks who are allergic to 0's in version > numbers). >
I like. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
