Hello, Am I the only person confused by this?
WR>STABLE RELEASES, 2.{odd}.{revision} WR>------------------------------------ WR>All even numbered releases will be considered stable revisions. WR>DEVELOPMENT RELEASES, 2.{even}.{revision} WR>----------------------------------------- WR>All even numbered releases designate the 'next' possible stable release, WR>therefore te current development version will always be one greater than WR>the stable release. Is the former sentence a typo? Shouldn't that say "All odd numbered releases" under the "STABLE RELEASES" header? I personally think maintaining stable/dev branches is a fine idea. I like the x.0 rationale for keeping even numbered versions development, and it also fits with Apache 1.3.x... but I also think it could be confusing if many other open source projects use odd numbered versions for development and Apache is the exception. And while I'm not by any means a core Apache developer I agree it seems a little premature to vote on this change right this instant. Humbly, Andrew ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Andrew Ho http://www.tellme.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Voice 650-930-9062 Tellme Networks, Inc. 1-800-555-TELL Fax 650-930-9101 ----------------------------------------------------------------------