* William A. Rowe, Jr. ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : > At 02:22 PM 10/17/2002, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > The one main suggestion I have to OtherBill's rules is that the stable > > release tree of httpd should be under RTC not CTR. This ensures > > deliberation on our parts for integrating items into the stable tree. > > I was laughing at calling the whole process CTRTC (commit to dev, > review, then commit to stable.) Doesn't slow anyone down from fixing > bits in dev. Then (preferably as a single unified patch after all the little > bits settle down) post for vote to commit into stable. This simplifies > review, as all the bits can be worked and debated for days, weeks, > months, as they relate to one big change, without constantly asking > for votes.
This idea sounds brilliant, and exactly what is needed. +1 Cheers, -Thom -- Thom May -> [EMAIL PROTECTED] < robster> SHIT < robster> woody doesnt support devfs < willy> devfs is FUcking Shit < liiwi> willy: quick now! tell it to stop before it gets itself dirty!
