Sounds like a reasonable compromise. I'm not a huge fan of using STATUS for these things, but it's as good a place as anywhere else.
david ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Trawick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 1:44 PM Subject: compromise on RTC vs. CTR for stable??? > Since the relatively few people who voted left us at an impasse on > this, it seems appropriate to try to find a compromise. (I've been > told before that something other than normal RTC-with-3-+1 vs. CTR > isn't the Apache way or something to that effect, but I don't see that > such concerns should stand in the way of each side giving up some > ground.) > > How about using this for the stable tree? > > To merge something from dev to stable (or fix it in stable if the fix > is specific to stable): > > either > > three committers (including submitter) state their approval > > or > > four days elapses with no objections > > An entry in the STATUS file for that period of time will be necessary > to satisfy the second criteria. Such an entry will often be helpful > for satisfying the first criteria as well. > > -- > Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Born in Roswell... married an alien... >
