Because when I run the make I get the following errors:

make[3]: Entering directory
`/usr/people/trev/src/httpd-2.0.44/modules/experimental'
/bin/sh /usr/people/trev/src/httpd-2.0.44/srclib/apr/libtool --silent
--mode=compile gcc  -g -O2    -D_POSIX_THREAD_SAFE_FUNCTIONS
-DAP_HAVE_DESIGNATED_INITIALIZER
-I/usr/people/trev/src/httpd-2.0.44/srclib/apr/include
-I/usr/people/trev/src/httpd-2.0.44/srclib/apr-util/include
-I/usr/local/include -I. -I/usr/people/trev/src/httpd-2.0.44/os/unix
-I/usr/people/trev/src/httpd-2.0.44/server/mpm/prefork
-I/usr/people/trev/src/httpd-2.0.44/modules/http
-I/usr/people/trev/src/httpd-2.0.44/modules/filters
-I/usr/people/trev/src/httpd-2.0.44/modules/proxy
-I/usr/people/trev/src/httpd-2.0.44/include
-I/usr/freeware/lib/openssl/include/openssl
-I/usr/freeware/lib/openssl/include
-I/usr/people/trev/src/httpd-2.0.44/modules/dav/main -prefer-non-pic
-static -c mod_auth_ldap.c && touch mod_auth_ldap.lo
mod_auth_ldap.c:82:2: #error mod_auth_ldap requires APR-util to have LDAP
support built in
mod_auth_ldap.c:104: parse error before "deref_options"
mod_auth_ldap.c:104: warning: no semicolon at end of struct or union
mod_auth_ldap.c:120: parse error before '}' token
mod_auth_ldap.c:120: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
mod_auth_ldap.c:139: parse error before "mod_auth_ldap_config_t"
mod_auth_ldap.c:168: parse error before "mod_auth_ldap_config_t"
mod_auth_ldap.c: In function `mod_auth_ldap_build_filter':
mod_auth_ldap.c:175: `filtbuf' undeclared (first use in this function)
mod_auth_ldap.c:175: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
mod_auth_ldap.c:175: for each function it appears in.)


Is there another place I should point the --with-apr-util option
inside the apache-2.0.44 tree??

Thanks,

-- Trev

On
Wed, 26 Feb
2003,
Cliff Woolley wrote:

> On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Trevor Hurst wrote:
>
> > No one wants to take a stab at this eh?
> > I know there must be someone out there
> > amongst the dev community that would know what
> > the problem is?
> > >
> > > I've built and installed both apr 0.9.1 and apr-util 0.9.1.
>
> Why did you build and install apr and apr-util rather than using the ones
> bundled with Apache?  I'm not sure that version 0.9.1 had the APU_BINDIR
> variable (I'd have to check... Justin would probably know).  We're not at
> the point yet where we have declared a particular version number of apr
> and apr-util to work with Apache 2.0.44 (or any other 2.0.x release) other
> than the one bundled with it.
>
> --Cliff
>
>

Reply via email to