Justin, I've tried pointing both apr and apr-util to the
prefix INSTALL_DIR which is /usr/local/apr. To no avail it
fails with the same errors no matter what. I've also tried
pointing it at my build tree after successful builds of both.

0.9.1 is *very* old? Please let me know where I can find
a newer version because last I looked (yesterday) on
apr.apache.org, it shows Sep. 11th, 2002 latest build
0.9.1 ????? And I'm speaking of what's in the released
area and not the CVS repositories.

Thanks for the response.

Cheers,

-- Trev

--
Trevor Hurst
Senior Systems Administrator
DCO Unix Production Systems
Silicon Graphics
Office Ph: 650.933.6144
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pager: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
Thus a mind that is free from passion is a very citadel;
man has no stronger fortress in which to seek shelter and
defy every assault. Failure to perceive this is ignorance;
but to perceive it, and still not to seek its refuge, is
misfortune indeed. --Marcus Aurelius

On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

> --On Wednesday, February 26, 2003 5:00 PM -0800 Trevor Hurst
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> -prefer-non-pic -static -c mod_auth_ldap.c && touch
> >> mod_auth_ldap.lo
> >> mod_auth_ldap.c:82:2: #error mod_auth_ldap requires APR-util to
> >> have LDAP support built in
>
> Sounds like you need to specify --with-ldap.  APR-util isn't finding
> your LDAP libraries.  Check the configure output to make sure that
> apr-util found your LDAP library correctly.
>
> >> > the ones bundled with Apache?  I'm not sure that version 0.9.1
> >> > had the APU_BINDIR variable (I'd have to check... Justin would
> >> > probably know).  We're not at the point yet where we have
>
> Probably not.  0.9.1 is *really* old.  -- justin
>

Reply via email to