-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:

> IIUC, we still require Port for any non-standard listeners to create the correct
> server name (e.g. http://ServerName:Port/{redirect}) references.

Well, I always remove the Port directive and replace it with a Listen
directive (ie, I use this patch on live systems) and even those running
on non-standard ports seem to redirect to the right places.

> If this is not true, then I agree, remove it.  But do we now pick up the Port
> from the ServerName directive in 1.3?

I don't specifically know the answer to this, but it Works For Me. I'll
wait to see if anyone thinks that this will cause a problem.

> If they can follow the Apache 2 conventions, it makes migration easier, so
> if my fears are unfounded, +1.

- -- 
Rich Bowen
Apache - mod_perl - Perl - CGI
http://www.ApacheAdmin.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6

iD8DBQE+apwjXP03+sx4yJMRAgOfAJ9PuzfhQTDqyxkvkePB3c5rB6OuOQCggC8R
N69mx6SUW6uhNZ06emo030k=
=yMDm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to