-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 9 Mar 2003, Joshua Slive wrote:
> > On Sat, 8 Mar 2003, Rich Bowen wrote: > > > It has irritated me for a while that the default Apache 1.3 > > configuration contains the Port directive, when the documentation says > > not to use it. Does anyone object to this: > > Could you point me to those docs? I find that I'm now rather confused, as I can't find the actual doc anywhere that says this. Although the documentation for Port itself now confuses me a great deal. I think that I'm jumbling 2.x and 1.3 in my mind. > I was under the impression that Port was necessary in some situations, > in just the same way as ServerName. For example, if you accept requests > on many ports, but you always want to issue redirects to one particular > port. This is not the case in practice. On my servers, I tend to run stuff on several ports - for testing purposes or whatnot - and I never use Port in my configurations, just Listen. However, I also always have UseCanonicalName Off, so I may be just a little confused here too. I'll experiment some more with this, and get back to you. - -- Rich Bowen - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://kenya.rcbowen.com/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.75-6 iD8DBQE+bJTsXP03+sx4yJMRAkWNAJ9t16eX7AkB/6nd0ZZowDsYCXGBzACeJOkg 7FBcIUPEF3SXKNQKziV2naU= =fhhK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
