> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:39 PM
>>>3. use the API versioning which is present in httpd-2.0 (and later) to >>> define two back-end interfaces for mod_dav. The current interface >>> is v1, and the new "pool accepting" interface becomes v2. mod_dav >>> is updated so that it can use either interface. mod_dav_svn is >>> updated to supply both: the old wrapper-based form, and the new >>> form. This will allow a mix/match between httpd-2.0.X (and 2.X.Y) >>> and mod_dav_svn. >> >> I'm mostly asking, is this a real win? > > This is Greg Stein's department; I'm not familiar with the political > implications of our various options. ("Do we make v1 and v2 provider > interfaces available to the 2.0 branch? Or just declare that mod_dav > has a new API in httpd-2.1?") I'll let him address this topic. If we want to make use of it in Subversion, then it [the v2 provider API] needs to be available in 2.0. Otherwise why would you bother fixing it? ;) Sander