>> What about a second parameter to ErrorLog? > That's an interesting idea. > I can change ErrorLog to a TAKE12 to take an optional parameter so as not > to break existing configs. Is this method preferred to a second directive?
I can't tell, this is preferred or this is not preferred, espacially not for 1.3. It's only my personal opinion not to create a new directive for every small behavior option. So if you ask me: yes I would preferr this. :) But maybe there are other opinions ... Kess
