--On Tuesday, June 17, 2003 12:07 PM -0400 Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ap_hook_pre_config_ex() should work
I'd be fine with a new hook in 2.0, but 2.1+ should just have pre_config modified to always take that pool parameter. I don't see a need to keep cruft around just for cruft's sake.
of course (like apr_socket_create_ex() only in pre-1.0 APR)
for this particular hook it doesn't seem problematic... modules should only care that they get called at all, with no order requirements, right?
ap_run_pre_config() ap_run_pre_config_ex()
for access checker OTOH some magic would be necessary to run things in the right order if something horrible happens and we need extended flavor of access checker
