Nick Kew wrote:

Yes - both those and reverse-proxy.  Is there supposed to be anything
problematic about that?

(the forward-proxy is very low traffic, FWIW.  The reverse proxy was
expected to be low-traffic too, then unexpectedly jumped to 200K / day).

I was just trying to guage the possible impact of the transparent proxy patch. So far, it seems safest to apply the patch to v2.1, and then publish it as a minor change-in-behaviour.


+1 on adding the ptch to v2.1.

Regards,
Graham
--



Reply via email to