On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 13:32, Ben Laurie wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > nd 2004/01/01 05:26:26 > > Log: > > update license to 2004. > > Why? Unless the file changes in 2004, the copyright doesn't. And, in any > case, the earliest date applies, so it gets us nowhere.
We seem to have this discussion every year. I'm too lazy to extensively dig in the archives, but: http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]&msgNo=79209 Roy: "That would change a lot more, and a lot less, than we want. I've committed the change for 2.0 and will do 1.3 next." Roy, care to explain what it is we want (and more importantly why)? I promise to mold the answer into a developer FAQ. Sander
