>-----Original Message----- >From: Justin Erenkrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [SNIP] >--On Wednesday, March 3, 2004 4:24 PM -0800 "Mathihalli, Madhusudan" ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I thought it'll be a little too much :) What if I don't compile with >> mod_ssl - I'll have a whole bunch of declarations with no definitions >> associated with it. Besides, mod_proxy.c follows the same logic. > >No, Joe just re-did mod_proxy.c and mod_ssl.h to stop that insanity. > >Run 'cvs up' against HEAD. ;-) -- justin
Gosh.. don't know how I missed it - thanks ! Anyways with the new mod_ssl.h - yup, we can do with including mod_ssl.h. -Madhu
