At 03:12 PM 3/13/2004, Sander Striker wrote: >On Sat, 2004-03-13 at 21:35, Jeff Trawick wrote: >> Sander Striker wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I hereby would like to propose that we move the HTTP Server project >> > codebase to the Subversion repository at: >> > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/. >> >> So when? >> >> Can we get some lead time (7-10 days from the time there is a complete httpd >> and apr snapshot in subversion to play with) so developers can get clients >> installed everywhere and have time to address platform issues or changed >> scripting requirements before the project switches over? > >Ofcourse. Your idea of giving lead time starting when we have a test >snapshot is very sensible. Lets make that 14 days from then, so that >everyone has plenty of time to address issues.
One issue I immediately foresee... as the GNU, ASF, and SF projects all discovered, full backups by third parties are invaluable. What is the equivalent to rsync, and is it as stable? As I mentioned to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]'ers I would feel much safer moving 2.1-dev over to SVN (with APR 1.0) and leaving 2.0/apr 0.9 alone to the end of their useful life. Bill
