William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > > At 07:09 AM 5/28/2004, Jim Jagielski wrote: > >I've backed out that patch and asked Rasmus to send a replacemnet > >which addresses his specific problem but does not cause > >the below behavior. > > > >I'm tempted to release 1.3.32... > > Collect another week or few of data on other problems first, perhaps? > Once the replacement patch arrives - we have a home for this over > in /dist/httpd/patches/apply_to_1_3_31/, right? > > I'd also like to see a few other minor quibbles fixed, like the change > of canonical name behavior. I do have to wrap my head around that > issue still. >
Well, I didn't mean immediately :) I do mean to release 1.3.32 much sooner than previous 1.3 versions have been released, like sometime in June. Although I'm still mulling over the UCN issue (and when/how to have Apache sort through the logic flow of how to "choose" the correct port number), there are other patches that would be beneficial to fold in, like the various ones you provided. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little liberty for a little order will lose both and deserve neither" - T.Jefferson
