Joshua Slive wrote: > On Sat, 5 Jun 2004, Rici Lake wrote: > >>>What about keeping the old error message, but logging an *additional* >>>message at loglevel debug with the additional info? >> >>That is certainly possible but I was trying to make things as easy as possible >>for newbies. I think having both modules available, and using a -D flag to >>select which one to load would probably work out better. But that is just one >>person's opinion. > > > I can say with relative certainty that you won't get people to agree to > that solution. It involves a bunch of new complexity (distributing and > compiling two almost-identical modules) for one new debugging feature. > Opening httpd.conf and finding the LogLevel directive, which appears only > once, should be relatively easy.
and more idiomatic, I'd say - if it's extra debugging information you're after, I would _expect_ lowering the LogLevel to provide it (if it's available at all). personally, I add this kind of stuff at 'info' and save 'debug' for guts-type things, as debug is more verbose by design anyway. but adding the additional information at either level sounds like a good idea. --Geoff
