On Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:12:02 +0300, Tom Alsberg wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 11:30:22AM -0400, Geoffrey Young wrote: > > So to ask differently: Any work in progress to get this into the > 2.1-HEAD branch? I just don't want that patch to sit there dead.
> Given that nobody has said so much more, I'd assume nobody objects to > the current form of the patch. If there's a problem - please don't > just forget it because the current form isn't to your liking... >From reading the bug report, it seems that there was one objection to the patch, in that it adds a new keyword, and the preference was to extend the existing AllowOverride keyword. So the next step should be to update the patch to use the existion keyword with the Options= style usage and attach that patch to the bug report. > > OK. Any forum which might be more appropriate, if so, to discuss > changes to the 2.1-HEAD branch? This mailing list is the perfect place to discuss changes to the 2.1-HEAD branch. > > -- Tom Edward Rudd
