On Wed, 22 Sep 2004 08:39:04 -0500, William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can we quickly identify what else was broken to roll out 2.0.52 > in the next day or two? I presume this too was 2.0.51 specific?
it is my understanding that the mod_mem_cache double-free was a regression introduced in 2.0.51
