R�diger Pl�m wrote:


Justin Erenkrantz wrote:

--On Tuesday, September 28, 2004 5:28 PM +0200 R�diger Pl�m <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


[..cut..]


Many thanks for the quick response. As I was curious I had a look to the cvs.
Sorry for the maybe stupid question. Do I understand this correctly: You commit the
changes to the main branch (aka. Apache 2.1) and Bill Stoddard backports them to the Apache 2.0 branch.
So the fixes for 21492 and 30278 will be part of 2.0.53 if Bill finds time to backport them to the
the Apache 2.0 branch before 2.0.53 is released?

Well the process is not quite so structured by design, but yes, I plan to propose we backport these into 2.0 (in time for 2.0.53) and I'll do the backport as I have time (maybe later this week).


You can help by testing Justin's patch and providing feedback to this list.

Thanks,
Bill

Reply via email to