moving to dev@ list >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tuesday, November 16, 2004 6:00:16 PM >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
+1 it might open up a couple of bugs/regressions, but it will certainly mean more fixes going in On 17/11/2004, at 10:08 AM, Brad Nicholes wrote: > During ApacheCon several httpd PMC members got together to discuss > current issues with the httpd project and to try to find better ways to > manage the project. One of the issues that was discussed heavily was > the current policy of RTC vs CTR. The feeling of some of the PMC > members is that the RTC policy as it is currently implemented on the > 2.0 > branch, is causing unnecessary overhead which has resulted in the > slowdown of activity in the httpd project. One proposal that was made > would be to adopt a lazy consensus rule. Basically what this means is > that when a backport is proposed in the STATUS file, after a period of > time and if the proposal has not recieved any 0 or -1 votes, it would > automatically be approved for backport by lazy consensus. The purpose > for this proposal is to avoid stagnation of backport proposals in the > STATUS file simply due to the lack of votes. > > > Brad > - -- Ian Holsman Director Network Management Systems CNET Networks PH: 415-344-2608 (USA) /(++61) 3-9818-0132 (Australia) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFBmqKgq3pgvCz4ZCcRAk6aAJ4pjGy170JuvPoq8fWgWtsf3Qw+kQCfXSe+ RmXGGKTaFWWTH6UeO/IQVZU= =k5e/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
