* Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --On Friday, November 26, 2004 12:05 AM +0000 Max Bowsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Actually aclocal belongs to automake. > > Correct. > > > But then, it would be a weird system where autoconf/automake/libtool are > > not installed as a group, so I guess that's still ok.
oops. (Who the hell named that tool aclocal?!) > No, it's not. I purposely don't install automake. I'd be really interested in the reasons. > -1 as we can't (won't) make httpd depend on automake. Just to be fair, we would make developers depend on automake, not httpd. > Please find some other way to address this problem. -- justin I'd guess, something like apr-util/xml/expat/buildconf.sh does? As you refuse to install aclocal, it could be your favorite task >:-> nd -- "Solides und umfangreiches Buch" -- aus einer Rezension <http://pub.perlig.de/books.html#apache2>