Based on the results from the '[PROPOSAL] Branch 2.1.x on May 13', there are enough positive votes create the 2.1.x branch on this Friday:
+1: justin, Brad, Sander, (me) -1: wrowe +1, but latter discussed problems: Jim Instead of calling it branches/2.1.x, on IRC wrowe suggested going straight to branches/2.2.x, and on further thought I agree. There is little point is calling it 2.1.x, if its only purpose is to become 2.2.x. If we really want to move forward towards GA, we should just start on 2.2.x releases, and use the standard -alpha, and -beta names on the tarbals, until one is good enough for GA. I doubt that the first alpha will be perfect, but the version numbers are cheap. My intention is to roll 2.2.0-alpha on Friday or early Saturday, after copying trunk to branches/2.2.x. This is different from the original details of the '[PROPOSAL] Branch 2.1.x on May 13' thread, but the result is the same. Votes on going straight to 2.2.0-alpha?
