On 7/13/05 2:43 PM, "Graham Leggett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This was one of the basic design goals of the new cache, but the code > for it was never written. > > It was logged as a bug against the original v1.3 proxy cache, which > suffered from thundering herd when cache entries expired. > > At some point soon when my mailbox is a little less full and I have a > week or two spare, I plan to fix this problem if nobody beats me to it :) Should only take a couple of hours to get a working patch together. Maybe I'll get time this week for mod_disk_cache -- Brian Akins Lead Systems Engineer CNN Internet Technologies
- mod-cache-requestor plan Parin Shah
- Re: mod-cache-requestor plan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: mod-cache-requestor plan Graham Leggett
- Re: mod-cache-requestor plan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: mod-cache-requestor plan Parin Shah
- Re: mod-cache-requestor plan Parin Shah
- Re: mod-cache-requestor plan Akins, Brian
- Re: mod-cache-requestor plan Parin Shah
- Re: mod-cache-requestor plan Akins, Brian
- Re: mod-cache-requestor plan Graham Leggett
- Re: mod-cache-requestor pl... Akins, Brian
- Re: mod-cache-requestor plan Ian Holsman
- Re: mod-cache-requestor plan Akins, Brian
- Re: mod-cache-requestor pl... Ian Holsman
- Re: mod-cache-requestor pl... Akins, Brian
- Re: mod-cache-requestor pl... Parin Shah
- Re: mod-cache-requestor pl... Colm MacCarthaigh
- Re: mod-cache-requestor pl... Parin Shah
- Re: mod-cache-requestor pl... Ian Holsman
- Re: mod-cache-requestor pl... Parin Shah
- Re: mod-cache-requestor pl... Ian Holsman