On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 01:46:30PM -0700, Paul Querna wrote: > Bill Stoddard wrote: > > Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > >> I have a bug I'd like to squash in mod_auth_ldap.c in 2.0 that doesn't > >> exist in 2.1/2.2 (non-existent authn_ldap_request_t req struct during > >> auth check)... since the module is experimental, can I assume CTR ? > > > > +1 > > > > IMO, imposing RTC on experimental modules is counter productive. > > -1 (vote, not veto).
Likewise -1. > It should be reviewed, regardless of being on applicable to 2.0. Put it > in the status file, just like everything else. I feel that being in > 'experimental' is not a good excuse for not requiring the same level of > review as any other change. Plus, the "experimental"-ness of any 2.0 modules is largely meaningless to users, they just --enable-auth-ldap and don't care about the module directory structure. joe
