Colm MacCarthaigh wrote:
[..cut..] > > Sometimes things are marked experimental not because they are unstable > in the sense that they contain a disproportionate ammount of bugs we > have yet to notice, but rather are unstable in the sense that their > behaviour or API may change in future versions - because the developers > havn't quite got a feel for what might be optimal in the majority case > yet. > > IMO, things like the event MPM or caching in 2.0 fall in to this > category, and I've been happy to run them in production. > > The trouble with these things is that being in GA tarballs is what > eventually lets us figure out what works for the majority case. > > I'm not sure asking power users and devs to test these things is as > useful an alternative for this category of things. > I totally agree. Regards Rüdiger
