* Paul Querna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-10 22:57:44]: > Maxime Petazzoni wrote: > >* Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-10 22:33:16]: > > > >>>3. We should probably turn on the email-address-obfiscation feature. I > >>>personally would prefer if everyone could just use proper spam > >>>filtering, but I think the general expectation nowadays is that we try > >>>to avoid displaying raw addresses. > >>I think this feature is lame (and said so when it was proposed). > >>Spammers are just going to de-obfuscate anyway. Enabling this provides > >>a false layer of security that does no one any good. > > > >Ok, you are a spam bot and you don't have the slightest idea of who > >f*** I am. > > > >Now, please, de-obfuscate this : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Or even this : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Actually, I feel that last example makes it a pain in the ass for the > rest of us humans to email someone about something.
No, because you have the full string From: header displayed : From: Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> And I hope the rest of us humans aren't that stupid ... - Sam -- Maxime Petazzoni (http://www.bulix.org) -- gone crazy, back soon. leave message.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
