On 10/19/2005 10:44 PM, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[..cut..] > > The problem is -not- in creating the transient buckets (if they are > sent, that's > goodness). The problem is in transforming them to persistant buckets > before the > core, ssl, or other filters who have set-aside operations decide to > return. So > there should have been no trouble creating the transient bucket below, the > trouble came in when the core filter didn't send the data, and also > didn't set > it aside :-( Sorry, maybe I am only confused, but I think I disagree with you on that. The proxy code is reading the input filter chain in a loop and does repeated calls to ap_get_brigade without doing any more things with these brigades it gets from ap_get_brigade, but storing them for later processing. This looks to me like a typical setaside situation. The data was not send because ap_proxy_http_request kept it for itself not sending it anyware. Regards Rüdiger [..cut..]
