On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 01:22:36PM +0100, Joe Orton wrote: > There was a thread about this previously; just checking for consensus, > is there any objection to bumping the apr/apr-util version requirements > to 1.2.x? (1.2.x is already required for mod_dbd, event MP, and it will > simplify the code to allow unconditional use of 1.2.x features)
-0. I don't think it's appropriate and pushes us even further on the bleeding edge of what vendors will provide. -- justin
