Roy T. Fielding wrote:
On Nov 28, 2005, at 5:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: pquerna
Date: Mon Nov 28 17:53:31 2005
New Revision: 349582
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=349582&view=rev
Log:
Tag 2.2.0 from 2.1.10 tag to prepare for the 2.2.0 release
What? No, sorry, -1. Your vote was on releasing 2.1.10. You should be
releasing 2.1.10 to the public as GA. 2.2.0 is different -- it requires
new documentation and a new tarball, and thus new votes.
Our rules also say that we cannot release 2.1.10 as GA. The next GA
release should be called 2.2.0.
I don't intend to release a 2.2.0 tarball without another vote. They
will be identical to the 2.1.10 tarballs, except for the version number.
(give me a few more minutes and they will be posted).
If you have a better way to manage the once-every-3 year changeover from
development to stable branches, please share it.
This is exactly what I said I would do in the [vote] thread for 2.1.10.
-Paul
