I'm no commiter but must concur -- until the build runs cleanly on
Windows 2.2.0 should not go out the door. Not everyone may like it, but Windows is a major Apache usage platform these days. -- Jess Holle Nick Kew wrote: On Tuesday 29 November 2005 08:32, Paul Querna wrote:Paul Querna wrote:These tarballs are Identical to 2.1.10 except for two changes:* include/ap_release.h Updated to be 2.2.0-release * The root directory was changed from httpd-2.1.10 to httpd-2.2.0Okay, I lied, slightly: * svn r348009: Added AP_DECLARE to mod_dbd exported functions. No functional changes for most operating systems.Yow! That reminds me: that was in response to someone complaining of a build failure on Windows, and he said it *still* failed with AP_DECLARE. Can someone with Windows *please* look at this? -1 for GA while this is outstanding! http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=apache-httpd-dev&m=113266737311013&w=2 |
- Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs Jess Holle
- Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs Colm MacCarthaigh
- Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs Jess Holle
- Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs Steffen
- Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs Colm MacCarthaigh
- Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs Joe Orton
- Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs Jim Jagielski
- Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs Jess Holle
- Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs Justin Erenkrantz
- Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs Jim Jagielski
- Re: [vote] 2.2.0 tarballs Justin Erenkrantz