Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > > --On December 24, 2005 12:00:57 AM +0100 Maxime Petazzoni > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Btw, why does this tarball should be called 0.2.1 ? Just because I > > changed some files in the archive ? I just need some explainations : > > since 0.2.0 was never released, why sould we increment the revision number > > to 0.2.1 ? > > Yes, a release is one-shot only. Once you announce it, it's technically > "burned." This is why we don't have release candidates... It is either > approved or it isn't. -- justin >
+1 -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
