* William A. Rowe, Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-12-23 17:53:40]: > Maxime Petazzoni wrote: > > > >Since this tarball was not yet a release, does it still apply ? You're > >getting self-contradictory here :) > > He really isn't... what Justin is saying is that the tarball you called > 0.2.0 > was created and pushed out to testers, so rerolling the same number isn't > good > practice. I agree with Roy, no code changes let's just keep moving forward, > but in the future a new number/tag is appropriate.
Understood. I'll learn from my mistakes :) (I just hope I won't make too many of them!) - Sam -- Maxime Petazzoni (http://www.bulix.org) -- gone crazy, back soon. leave message.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
