On 01/21/2006 11:11 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Ruediger Pluem wrote: >
[..cut..] >> >>If the patch is supplied by an external person I like to >>see the name of the committer in the CHANGES file who actually >>applied the patch even if goes in unchanged. This is >>not to appease the ego of the committer, but to have the information >>at hand who reviewed, possibly tested and committed the patch. >>Of course this information is also in subversion, but I think it >>eases investigations. >> > > > Nope. That's what subversion is for. Not CHANGES. > Ok. Then I had a different understanding from my osmosis :-). Any other comments on this? I have no problem adopting the above rules for future CHANGE entries. Regards Rüdiger
