Jim Jagielski wrote:
Yep, and that's why I think we close the connection each time;
umm, I thought the balancer would try to keep the connection open to
backends? A single client may wind up talking to multiple backend pools
over the course of a connection (/css -> A, /images -> B, etc.).
we're wasting sockets.
we'd be saving start up time on each socket.
So just to be clear, there is no connection pooling in proxy_balancer,
or is there? Did I imagine that it was supposed to be?
--
Brian Akins
Lead Systems Engineer
CNN Internet Technologies
