On Mon, Mar 27, 2006 at 02:26:39AM -0600, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Provided that passes, and if nobody speaks quickly and loudly, I'll RM a > tarball once that vote on [EMAIL PROTECTED] flies. Speak now if there are > issues :)
I don't know if it's implicit or not, but we shouldn't bundle unreleased libraries, so it shouldn't be enough that an apr(-util) passed the vote, it should be GA too. We need thicker chinese walls :) Just a minor change to our sometime-adopted procedure that might help non-APR httpd-committers out. I've finally deleted that patch proposal which made no sense and taken a look at some more of the proposals. Since this is our first post 2.2 GA release, do we still want feedback from infra? downgrading a.o might send some bad signals ;-) Or maybe there's a subdomain or two running 2.0 still? -- Colm MacCárthaigh Public Key: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
