Brian Akins wrote: > > Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > Well, there *are* 2 balancers... but yeah, it is quite > > confusing, and there are things that need to be > > further addressed here. > > I'm think of what if someone had a script that parses the > balancer-manager output. it would be very confusing to figure out which > is the "correct" balancer. > > Any reason we can't have the limitation that balancer names must be unique? >
I don't see why not. But the reason for the double is even deeper than that. You see, the balancer is defined at the main server config rec. When each Vhost is merged, they grab a "copy" of the main server's balancer config setup. So you have 2 balancers, one of which isn't used at all (the main server's) and one that is. -- =========================================================================== Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
