On Mon, 2006-31-07 at 19:34 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote:
> On Mon, July 31, 2006 6:43 pm, Guy Hulbert wrote:
>
> > This seems reasonable. Given paragraph 2 ("URL strategies etc") Not for
> > the reasons I've omitted (and responded to separately). However, I
> > still don't think this will scale the way router-based solutions can
> > (already :-).
>
> Users of mod_backhand (for httpd v1.3) would disagree, it's a similar
> solution that has been around for years. The lb support in v2.x will
> hopefully eventually allow users of mod_backhand to migrate to v2.x from
> v1.3.
Is google using mod_backhand ?
That's the ultimate case, after all :-)
>
> Regards,
> Graham
> --
>
>
--
--gh
