William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: > Sebastian Nohn wrote: >> please take the time to read it before voting against the proposal :)
> If the response is being forwarded through a proxy, the proxy application MUST > NOT modify the Server response-header. > > I haven't reviewed the patch, but I presume your patch honors this > requirement? Yes. > I've read your comments, agree it's 17 bytes (that you can just as well > remove, > as you point out, by hand.) > > I'm curious - do IE, Firefox or other common clients use the server name tag > as a clue for fixups around aberrant behavior or to enable optimal behavior? As far as I know, Firefox does'nt do anything in this direction. I did'nt find anything in the source either (which is no proof of course). Best regards, Sebastian Nohn -- Sebastian Nohn · Wolfstraße 29 · 53111 Bonn · Germany +49-228-4097103 · http://nohn.net/ · [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pgpkeys.pca.dfn.de:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&fingerprint=on&search=0xD47D55E0
