On 12/5/06, Jeff Trawick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A lot of opinions were offered back in August. Some were negative but I don't see anything that looks like a veto.
Why do I care personally? I'd like to see an easy resolution to the common support question which doesn't involve recompiling the server*, installing third-party modules+, trying to explain that the server implementation can be easily reverse engineered anyway@, or trying to explain that attackers just send everything they have regardless of which server implementation they think it [EMAIL PROTECTED] *alas, not possible with my day job but I can solve that in a different way +not a simple task in many corporate environments @generally this seems to fall on deaf ears; I suspect that many of these people have to document exceptions to the report of some scanner every n months
