On 02/06/2007 12:06 AM, Joe Orton wrote: > On Mon, Feb 05, 2007 at 09:26:25PM +0100, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
> >>Or do we need no bump at all as we currently do not install >>mod_cache.h in the includes directory and thus all things defined in >>mod_cache.h can be considered private? > > > I vote definitely "no bump". If the header is not installed by "make > install" it is by definition a private interface, and not part of the > public API/ABI. So no need to worry about MMN bumps, nor maintaining > backwards compat for 2.2.x, etc. Thanks for the reply. I guess I got confused by myself as I did a minor bump about a year ago in r370101 for adding further fields to the cache_server_conf struct defined in mod_cache.h. As 3rd parties might want to use the provider interface to provide their own storage providers it might be worth discussing if we *should* make this a public API and should install it via "make install". Regards Rüdiger
