ons 2007-04-11 klockan 10:46 -0500 skrev William A. Rowe, Jr.: > Firefox is fine with... > > ftp://[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ > > but it's odd enough I wouldn't trust that to be consistently supported, > and you raise a good point with proxy/firewalls.
The above isn't a correctly formed URL. MUST be (RFC wise) ftp://me%40myhost:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ which resolves the ambiguity, but is perhaps even less intelligible to the user. > So if, for example, the admin wanted to define & as the alternative > separator, ftp://me&myhost:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ would be a little less ambiguous > to browser-style schemas. Sounds reasonable. Except that it's quite impractical to use in HTML coding and very many applications (and users) rendering data into HTML will get it wrong.. Note: how most browser user agents implements the ftp:// URI scheme in general is quite far outside the standards, so it's not easy to know what will happen when trying something other than plain anonymous ftp with non-problematic characters, or even file paths.. Regards Henrik
signature.asc
Description: Detta är en digitalt signerad meddelandedel