On 05/18/2007 02:23 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > On 5/17/07, Ruediger Pluem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> why. Also the entity is not physically removed from the cache if it is >> really stale. >> This does not matter in the non HEAD case as it gets overwritten by >> the fresh response, >> but in the HEAD case it should be physically removed IMO. > > > Well, because rv == !OK, wouldn't the CACHE_REMOVE_URL filter hit? > That should do the dirty deed, no? -- justin
No, as the CACHE_REMOVE_URL filter will only work if there is a cache->handle or a cache->stale_handle. We have neither, as cache->stale_handle is set to NULL in the case that the cached entity is *really* stale and we do not create a new entity (and thus a cache->handle) in the HEAD case. Regards Rüdiger
